Ok.
Let’s stipulate some stuff right from jump.
Here is what we know, which studies have shown and which cannot be disputed: visits from loved ones to the incarcerated make for better outcomes while in custody, and contribute to lower recidivism once back outside.
Let’s also stipulate that most loved ones of the incarcerated are poor or otherwise economically vulnerable. Prisons are usually in remote outposts, away from loved ones, which takes gas or bus fare; time off from work (and many jobs don’t have PTO or vacay days that mitigate the impact from losing hours), one will probably need to buy at least two meals during the journey, and may even have to rent a motel room. This is real money, y’all.
These rules are meant to break the loved ones down; to break the bond with the prisoner, to discourage the very connections we know are beneficial.
Crazy thought–the state needs angry, reoffending, noncompliant stock to keep what are now often for profit prisons filled. This flies in the face that the law enforcement wants to bring crime down; wants to lower the number imprisoned. The state needs disconnected, isolated people whose ability to positively interact with their family and their friends have systematically been stripped away. The man in this story would have thought that his loved one did not care about him; would never have known how hard she tried. In psychology’s attachment theory, that is what is called an ‘attachment’ fissure, made worse by the artificial and punitive and dehumanizing environment he was already in.
This shit is by design.
*Original repost source is embedded with images of the Twitter feed added for ease of reading
Leave a Reply